Consumers Switching From ATVs To UTVs In Australia

Similar to the US market, a story out of Australia indicates that UTVs are displacing ATVs. The switch started occurring over the last four years or to five years and is expected to continue. The main reasons for the switch are safety and the ease in which users, especially older users, can get into and out of utility vehicles compared to getting onto and off an ATV. Safety is important for larger corporations and government entities supplying vehicles to workers. One dealer noted that in more rural areas and for smaller private operations ATVs are still holding their own. Learn more:  ABC.net.au

Comment:  This is not surprising to hear since the end user applications for STOVs have many similarities across the world, and market forces can be the same as well. UTVs can be more versatile with their cargo and seating capacity. UTVs also offer more safety features. ATVs offer a significantly lower cost and are better for narrow trails and work environments with limited space for maneuvering.  UTVs are likely to continue to take market share from ATVs but there will always be a demand for these vehicles that are more affordable and can perform very well in specific applications that don’t require all the functionality of a UTV.

A story out of Texas talks about the versatility of UTVs and their growing use over the last ten years. The ability to hunt, work and trail ride with a UTV makes them a year round multi-use vehicle. The safety features of the UTVs and the additional skill to use an ATV is also noted.  Learn more:  Amarillo.com

STOV Market Faces State & Local Regulatory Hurdles

Clendenin’s mini-truck no longer allowed on town streets and destined for auction.                   Photo credit: Kenny Kemp

A couple of recent stories illustrate the hurdles that STOVs face at the local and state level despite the vehicles being perfect for a given application. In one instance the small town of Clendenin, WV is auctioning off their mini-truck because town officials have determined it is not legal to drive the vehicle on city streets. For several years the town has been using the vehicle to haul debris and carry salt on the narrower and hillier streets where access by full-sized trucks is difficult.  While officials and workers thought the mini-truck was “perfect” for the tasks at hand the state of West Virginia does not allow mini-trucks to be registered. The town council passed an ordinance allowing the vehicle to be used within the city but their local ordinance cannot trump state law. The town is now using a F-150 Ford pick-up which costs $75 to fill-up instead of $20 for the mini-truck which is headed for the auction block.

In the second story a disabled man who had been using a Gator to travel around the roads of the small village of Union, IL was abruptly told he could no longer use the vehicle on city streets after years of doing so. He was told it was a matter of public safety.  While Illinois state law allows non-highway vehicles on roads with speed limits of 30 mph or less, local municipalities must pass an ordinance to do so. Proponents are using a social media campaign to encourage local officials to pass an ordinance.

Learn more:  WVGazette.com   NBCChicago.com

Commentary:  While the trend has been towards more and more municipalities allowing a wider range of STOVs on local streets, the process is very much piecemeal. As illustrated in the second story there are also instances where use is allowed or tolerated by not officially codified by a local ordinance. The issue is local control of streets, where in theory and more than likely in practice, local officials know what is best for their town. On the other hand, statewide regulations allowing STOVs on local low-speed streets would be a big boost to the STOV market and a much more efficient regulatory approach. The use of these vehicles are not likely a priority for many municipalities, even if officials perceived no safety hazard, so the widespread passage of local ordinances will take a long time to enact.

News from Lithium Boost Technologies

Lithium Boost Technologies signs manufacturing agreement with Bright Technologies

Lithium Boost Technologies, which produces a lithium battery system to replace the lead acid battery pack in golf cars, industrial and utility vehicles, recently announced a new safety feature and strategic manufacturing agreement. Their new interlock feature locks the vehicle in place to prevent the user from moving it while the battery is in the charging process.

The company also signed a manufacturing agreement with US/Mexico based Bright Manufacturing to produce wiring harnesses and electronic boards for the the battery systems. The agreement will allow the Lithium Boost to improve delivery time and meet growing demand.

Lithium Boost offers a variety of lithium iron phosphate battery solutions including, LithiumBoost Plus for leisure use, LithiumBoost Pro for industrial, and LithiumBoost Ultra for off-road. Depending on vehicle application, the product is available in 36, 48, & 72 volt systems and 60ah-200ah lithium-ion battery cells. Learn more:  Lithiumboost.com

Polaris Recalls 2011 Ranger RZR XP 900

Polaris 2011 Ranger RZR XP being recalled, also comes in white.

Polaris is recalling approximately 4,500 Ranger RZR XP 900 utility vehicles because the firewall behind the driver and passenger seats can overheat and melt, posing a burn hazard to consumers. One incident of a person burning their fingers has been reported. The vehicles are either white or red and were sold between May 2012 and February 2013. Owners should stop using the vehicles and take them to a Polaris dealer for a free repair. The company is also contacting owners directly. Learn more:  CPSC.gov

What’s Cooking on the STOV

Highlighting some of the many applications for small, task-oriented vehicles:

School Safety Vehicle – Vinemont schools in Alabama purchased a Polaris UTV for safety patrols and driver education classes. For safety patrols the vehicle can access campus areas that their existing patrol cars cannot.  The UTV will also be used in their DUI related sessions of their driver education program. Students will use special goggles that simulate driving while intoxicated while attempting to navigate a set driving course under instructor supervision. Learn more:  Cullmantimes.com

Airport Patrols & Maintenance:  Lambert St. Louis International Airport purchased four electric-powered GEMs to be used in their parking operations for patrols and maintenance. The vehicles will be covering two terminal garages and four long-term lots. The GEMs replaced full-size pick-up trucks. The replacement of pickup trucks is an ongoing trend we are seeing particularly in corporate/college campuses and park settings. Learn more:  Bizjournals.com

Scotland Business Park Switches to Electric Utility Refuse Vehicle:  Hillington Park, a business park in Scotland, is replacing a diesel powered van with a new Alke ATX200E battery-powered utility truck. The vehicle will be used for refuse collection on the campus that is home to 300 companies and 6,700 workers. The new purchase also fits in with their award winning environmental management of the business park.

I thought this example demonstrated a number of aspects of the STOV market. First the STOV market is global. As the STOV market continues to grow it is likely that companies will look for export markets for their vehicles. Second a significant portion of the electric powered segment of the STOV market is driven by “green” or sustainability issues. Third displacement of ICE vehicles is a continuing trend that drives sales for STOVs. Learn more:  Fleetnews.uk.co

A Tale of Three Towns & Road Use Regulation

Potential ordinances from three small towns, one in Colorado, another in Kansas, and a third in Canada demonstrate the different trends occurring regarding road use laws for STOVs. The different contexts for the vehicle use and the different goals of the local community dictate which trend a municipality follows.

In Nederland Colorado the governing body is reviewing an ordinance that allows NEVs/LSVs on local roads but excludes ATVs.  Meanwhile in Garden City, Kansas the city commission has passed an ordinance allowing “micro utility” vehicles on local roads as long as they have roll cages, head and tail lights, turn signals and seat belts. In Powell River, British Columbia the city council is considering an ordinance allowing LSVs and proponents make a point that golf cars and ATVs are not included.

In Nederland they point to decreasing noise and improving air quality. In Garden City the likely impetus is the use of vehicles by farmers and such that occasionally need public road access for work purposes. In Powell River proponents are trying to get the city to catch up to other municipalities in the province that have passed similar ordinances. The stumbling block is that in Canada NEVs/LSVs are only legal on roads with speed limits up to 40km/hr but most of the city’s streets have 50 km/hr speed limits. A common thread in all three is the importance of safety and basic safety features for the vehicles.  Learn more:  Westernkansasnews.com  Themtear.com  Hqsunshineoast.com

John Deere Recalls 4,700 UTVs

John Deere RSX850i

John Deere recalled some of their RSX850i utility vehicles

John Deere issued another recall for their RSX850i utility vehicle. The recall involves approximately 4,700 vehicles manufactured between May and October of 2012 and includes the RSX850i Base, Sport and Trail model utility vehicles. The reason for the recall is potential leaking from the oil filter which can pose a fire hazard. According to the CPSC, “Pinholes or cracks have been identified in oil filters installed by the engine supplier which were not manufactured to specification.” To date four fires but no injuries have been reported related to the issue.  Vehicles with the following serial numbers are affected:

1M0850TB++M010009 thru 1M0850TB++M010778
1M0850TS++M010001 thru 1M0850TS++M012077
1M0850TT++M010001 thru 1M0850TT++M012867

The vehicles were sold from  August 2012 through January 2013. Owners should stop using the vehicles and schedule a free inspection and repair with their local dealer.  John Deere will be contacting registered owners directly or they can call (800) 537-8233 for more information.

There appears to be some overlap between this recall and a previous one involving a fuel line issue. While the serial number ranges do not match exactly, the manufacturing timeframes are the same and the selling timeframes overlap several months. It is likely there were multiple problems with the same engines.

Learn more:  CPSC.gov

 

Club Car Recalls Vehicles

Club Car modified a previous recall of utility vehicles and golf cars, and has issued a new recall for a limited number of golf cars and transport vehicles. The modification of a previous recall from September 2012 involves a change in model and serial numbers. The complete list of relevant model and serial numbers is available at CPSC.gov. The recall still involves approximately 4,000 vehicles.

A separate recall involving approximately 950 golf cars and transport vehicles was initiated earlier this week. The recall involves five different gas-powered 2013 Precedent models.  The fuel hose could separate from the fuel tank, posing a fire hazard. Consumers should contact any Club Car dealer for a free inspection and repair of the fuel hose system. Club Car is also contacting owners directly. The relevant models and serial numbers follow:

Model Model number Serial number range
Prec i2 Signature 4 Pass Gas PW 1307-346775
Prec i2 Signature Gas PY 1307-346310 to 1307-346312
Precedent i2 4 Pass Gas PF 1307-345436 to 1311-352118
Precedent i2 Gas PR 1306-344140 to 1311-352109
Precedent i2L Gas CF 1307-345914 to 1310-349283

Learn more:  CPSC.gov

BRP Recalls 25,000 Can Am Commanders

BRP recently announced a recall of approximately 25,000 Can Am Commanders due to a fire hazard related to debris buildup around the exhaust pipe area. There have been 18 reports of fires related to the issue. The recall involves a wide range of models from 2011 to 2013. The models affected include:

Model Year 2011
Can-Am Commander 800R and 1000
Can-Am Commander XT 800R and 1000
Can-Am Commander X 1000

Model Year 2012
Can-Am Commander 800R and 1000
Can-Am Commander XT 800R and 1000
Can-Am Commander X 1000
Can-Am Commander Limited 1000

Model Year 2013
(without Front Grill Kit)
Can-Am Commander 800R and 1000
Can-Am Commander XT 800R and 1000
Can-Am Commander X 1000
Can-Am Commander Limited 1000
Can-Am Commander DPS 800R and 1000
The vehicles were sold from April 2010 through November 2012.

According to the company, consumers should immediately stop using the recalled vehicles, check their exhaust for accumulated debris as described in the Cleaning Procedure of Exhaust Area guide and contact a BRP dealer to schedule a free update kit repair. The guide is available to consumers at their local BRP dealer or online at www.can-am.brp.com. BRP has notified registered consumers directly about this recall and the vehicle’s cleaning guide.

Learn more:  CPSC.gov

John Deere and BRP Recall Utility Vehicles

Following on the heels of recent recalls announced in cooperation with Transport Canada, John Deere and BRP have announced similar recalls in cooperation with the Consumer Product Safety Commission in the US.

John Deere RSX850i UTV Recall – The company is recalling 4,650  RSX850i Base, Sport and Trail model utility vehicles manufactured between May 2012 and October 2012 because a fuel line may separate and create a fire hazard.  To date no injuries have been reported related to the issue.  Vehicles with the following serial numbers are affected:

1M0850TB++M010013 thru 1M0850TB++M010768
1M0850TS++M010001 thru 1M0850TS++M011932
1M0850TT++M010001 thru 1M0850TT++M012765

The vehicles were sold from August to September 2012.  Owners should stop using the vehicles and schedule a free inspection and repair with their local dealer.  John Deere will be contacting registered owners directly or they can call (800) 537-8233 for more information.  Learn more:  CPSC.gov

BRP Can-Am Commander Utility Vehicle Recall – BRP is recalling 3,400 of their various Can-Am Commander utility vehicles because an improper assembly of the steering column to the rack and pinion can result in the loss of steering control and pose a safety hazard.  To date no injuries have been reported related to the issue.  The recall involves the following model years and models:

Model Year 2011
Can-Am Commander 800 and 1000
Can-Am Commander XT 800R and 1000
Can-Am Commander X 1000

Model Year 2012                                                    Can-Am Commander 800 and 1000
Can-Am Commander XT 800 and 1000
Can-Am Commander X 1000
Can-Am Commander Limited 1000

The vehicles were sold between April 2011 and December 2012.  Owners should immediately stop using the recalled vehicles and contact a BRP dealer to schedule a free repair. BRP has notified registered consumers directly about this recall or they can be reached at  (888) 638-5397.  Learn more:  CPSC.gov